Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Kyle Baxter's column >>

KYLE BAXTER

Home Page
My thoughts were so loud I couldn't hear my mouth
Articles Posted: 134  Links Seeded: 1104
Member Since: 11/2006  Last Seen: 3/26/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

iPhone 3G and MobileMe First Thoughts

Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:52 PM EDT
technology, apple, iphone, att, 3g, mobileme
By Kyle Baxter
Advertise | AdChoices

Nothing was particularly shocking about this keynote -- rumors made sure of that. We knew MobileMe and iPhone 3G were coming, and we knew most of the details, but that does not mean there isn't anything interesting to discuss.

iPhone

First, besides the all-plastic back, iPhone 3G does not look much different -- and I am happy it does not. The original iPhone's front side was simply stunning. Because the screen and casing are similar in color, and the front is covered in a layer of glass, it looks like the screen covers the entire device. It has a certain elegance that is hard to describe.

Which is why I hoped that Apple would not change the iPhone's front. The design is too good to change.

The all-black backside, and the black front combine to make iPhone 3G seem even more subtle than the first.

iPhone is also a bit thicker now, too, at 12.3mm, but that increase appears to be imperceptible because the edges are thinner. It will likely look and feel like it is thinner, even though it is not.

Pricing, though, is the biggest news here. Apple dropped the 8GB model to $199, which is $400 less than when it debuted last year.

Jacqui Cheng at ArsTechnica just reported that Apple and AT&T have dropped their revenue-sharing agreement.

Some are speculating that while the iPhone now costs $199 for the 8GB or $299 for the 16GB, AT&T is actually paying Apple $399 or $499 for each iPhone sold in return for dropping the revenue-sharing agreement, which would amount to a subsidized iPhone.

I will be providing more thought on this Wednesday (along with an announcement), but in any case, the aggressive pricing and dropping of the revenue-sharing agreement signals that Apple is moving full-out to gain cell phone market share.

Which is an abrupt change in Apple's business model. With Macs, Apple's goal is not to take a significant chunk of market share from their competitors, but rather to sell high-end Macs with a strong profit margin.

Up until today, the iPhone followed a similar strategy. Apple would sell iPhone at a high-end price, and only wanted to take 1% market share by the end of 2008.

A $199 iPhone, while still too expensive for most phone users, puts it within reach of much more consumers. Perhaps most interestingly, though, and most tellingly, the iPhone now sells for $100 less than the iPod Touch, which reverses their order. Apple is aiming for dominance.

It is only unfortunate that we must wait a month to purchase it. I sold my original iPhone last week in anticipation of iPhone 3G, so I will be in the dark ages until then. Moving from an iPhone to a Motorola V557 is quite a bit like having your BMW replaced with a Flinstones' mobile, and getting kicked in the nuts. No exaggeration.

MobileMe

Last Monday, I detailed what I hoped MobileMe would be, and we saw most of it. The only thing Apple did not include was iPhone access to iDisk, but that was more speculation on what it could become.

MobileMe is what .Mac should have been -- a service which synchs your devices seamlessly, and gives you web access to your mail, calendar, and contacts that is at least as nice as desktop applications, if not better.

Synching between any of your computers and your iPhone is great, but what surprised me the most was the web applications Apple created. Mail is great -- I especially love the quick reply function.

The calendar of all things, though, made me say "wow" out loud. First, it looks excellent, at least as nice as iCal on the desktop. But here is the best part: to create an event, you click on the calendar at the correct day and time, and then drag down to set how long the event is. For example, if you have a date tonight, you would click on Monday at 7PM, and drag down until, say, 12AM (or however long your date goes -- results may vary), and then release. If you need to change which calendar this event belongs to, you just drag it onto the appropriate calendar and drop. Done.

That does not sound like much to be surprised by -- and that is why it is so great. The UI looks simple and effortless to use, like it is a desktop application. But it is all through a browser, using web standards. Apple is truly pushing the bounds here with what can be done in HTML/CSS/Javascript, and it is incredible to see. Hats off to the MobileMe development team.

MobileMe is not being positioned just for Mac users. The MobileMe page prominently shows a Windows PC, and the walkthrough video shows MobileMe synching with Outlook.

This all has to do with how Apple is positioning MobileMe -- Exchange for the rest of us. Not Exchange for Mac users, but for everyone.

The iPhone, with MobileMe, will also compare quite strongly against the Blackberry. To receive data on your Blackberry, you must also subscribe to a Blackberry data plan. Currently on AT&T, the lowest Blackberry data plan is $30 a month, or $360 per year.

A full year of iPhone data, plus MobileMe, is $340 -- cheaper than the Blackberry's plan, with much more: you get push email, calendar and contacts, the best online access of any service, photo galleries, and 20GB of online storage.

That is a rather convincing comparison for me. Cheaper, and more features.

Update: Well, my reasoning for the iPhone+MobileMe comparing favorably to the Blackberry was just invalidated in record time. Gizmodo is now reporting that the iPhone 3G will require a $30 data plan, and must be activated in the store. I am not happy about this news at all, especially the last part.

Cross-posted on my blog, TightWind.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Kyle Baxter's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: GeekVine, Newsvine Technology, Technology Gateway, The Infinite Loop
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (40)
Kyle Baxter

Exciting, but most disappointing is that the iPhone will in essence be just like any other phone on AT&T's service. Data plan prices are the same for other 3G phones -- $30 a month, which sucks to be honest.

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Jun 9, 2008 6:57 PM EDT
electricblanket

good to know...the calling/data plans were the thing i was most curious about.

contemplating getting an iphone but am going to have to reexamine total costs before possibly biting.

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Mon Jun 9, 2008 10:33 PM EDT
spiffie

After I read about the bump to $30 for the data plan for the iPhone, I went and checked out AT&T's other data plans for smart phones. Both the unlimited data Blackberry plan and the PDA plan have been bumped to $35 (pretty sure that's recent), so although it kind of sucks it doesn't look like AT&T is raping its iPhone customers any more (and actually a bit less) than their other smartphone customers.

  • 1 vote
#1.2 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:26 PM EDT
Kyle Baxter

With a voice or family plan, the Blackberry data plan is the same $30 as the iPhone: Blackberry Data Plans.

I've warmed up a bit to the $30/month because of what it includes (much faster speeds, GPS), but it's still disappointing -- iPhone-specific plans were nice.

  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:09 PM EDT
Reply
Tedd Riggs

It was a little of a let down on the overall WWDC. Nothing on SnowLeopard and the MobileMe. Yikes, talk about a copy of a disaster logo....ouch.

However MobileMe is making Windows Mobile look really bad at the moment. And for me, I love .mac service, so MobileMe is even nicier, so I think its awesome.

On the iPhone. I did notice that the description of it changed just a little right after the on-line store came back after it was down. On the colors, when you selected White, it had "others" on the list for a little while, so I am wondering if the Engadget Photo that showed a Black, White and a Red version might have been correct.

Also I am not sure I understand the GPS part. is that a real GPS ? or a cell phone type GPS using cell tower signals like what is used now for the Google Service App. for the iPhone and the iTouch ?

  • 6 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Jun 9, 2008 9:21 PM EDT
Henry VII

Huh? They talked about MobileMe for a long-ass while. Did you listen to it at all?

Also, Snow Leopard was discussed - just not at the Keynote.

  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:48 AM EDT
Reply
Brian Ford

It is only unfortunate that we must wait a month to purchase it. I sold my original iPhone last week in anticipation of iPhone 3G, so I will be in the dark ages until then. Moving from an iPhone to a Motorola V557 is quite a bit like having your BMW replaced with a Flinstones' mobile, and getting kicked in the nuts. No exaggeration.

Yeah, but didn't you sell it for a hefty chunk? It'd be hard to get more than 150 out of a 1st Gen iPhone now, and I'd say you'd be stretching it to ask for more than 125.

  • 5 votes
Reply#3 - Mon Jun 9, 2008 11:10 PM EDT
Kyle Baxter

Yeah -- in a month, it will be worth it. I sold my original 8GB iPhone for $350, so basically I am upgrading to a 16GB iPhone 3G for free (once you consider buying the dock, which is now an accessory).

  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Mon Jun 9, 2008 11:28 PM EDT
Nick Ford

I'd buy one for the aluminum back.

  • 3 votes
#3.2 - Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:49 AM EDT
spiffie

The aluminum back was pretty snazzy, but I imagine one reason Apple switched to plastic was reception. The iBooks/MacBooks have pretty consistently gotten better Wi-Fi reception than the PowerBook/MBP lines; that likely carries over to cell phones, too.

  • 1 vote
#3.3 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:29 PM EDT
Brian Ford

Also, the aluminum back is fairly easy to ding up. Though, I've been really careful with mine and it still looks really good.

  • 1 vote
#3.4 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:57 PM EDT
Kyle Baxter

It was nice, though, because it was difficult to scratch. Mine looked great even after a year of use.

For that reason I am going back and forth on whether to get black or white. I figure the black will show scratches more than the white.

  • 1 vote
#3.5 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:12 PM EDT
Reply
MasterNav

Ted, the GPS is bona fide GPS in addition to cell tower triangulation and WiFi locationing. Which class of GPS was not presented - so that remains to be seen.

Thanks for the good coverage Kyle.

  • 4 votes
Reply#4 - Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:24 AM EDT
Tedd Riggs

Thanks MasterNav,

Think that will have any impact on battery life ? GPS use tends to be thirsty in most cases.

  • 4 votes
#4.1 - Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:19 AM EDT
electricblanket

hopefully one can disable gps so it isn't sucking battery juice the 99% I wouldn't need/use it

  • 3 votes
#4.2 - Tue Jun 10, 2008 7:45 PM EDT
Dr Juice

GPS on iPhone is active only when you need it. iPhone powers the GPS unit on and off quickly and automatically, so it won't adversely affect battery life.

iPhone GPS page. Sounds like it will kick in when you launch the Maps app and quit when you close it.

  • 3 votes
#4.3 - Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:04 PM EDT
MasterNav

Battery management will be interesting in this case. You now have, I think, 3 more transceivers demanding power, because they ADDED the 3G and the GPS transceivers to the 2.5G transceiver . The two telecom t/cs I think run mutually exclusive (or should) and the GPS is "on demand" as Dr. Juice noted above. However if you look at the stats cited on the Tech Specs - you get twice the battery life for talk-time on 2.5G - its less "packet-chatty" than 3G. So look for your worst time-life on the battery charge to be when you run 3G, GPS, with Bluetooth and WiFi active - highest transceiver power demands. Leaving Bluetooth and WiFi active during routine use not using either, burns up your charge much faster.

  • 2 votes
#4.4 - Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:57 PM EDT
Dr Juice

Do they have the same 2.5G radio? I thought that 3G radios could step down, ala 802.11 networking.

    #4.5 - Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:34 PM EDT
    MasterNav

    Two separate transceivers I believe, it will flip to 2.5G when 3G is not available.

      #4.6 - Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:18 AM EDT
      Brian Ford

      So look for your worst time-life on the battery charge to be when you run 3G, GPS, with Bluetooth and WiFi active - highest transceiver power demands.

      Apple addresses this by having GPS active ONLY when necessary. Apps which use geo-tagging ask the user whether they wish to transmit location data. In short: Apple prioritized battery life when it comes to GPS.

      • 2 votes
      #4.7 - Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:21 AM EDT
      Reply
      Spuds Stuff

      I'm excited because New Zealand is going to be one of the 1st countries to get the 3G iPhone (July 11th).

      • 2 votes
      Reply#5 - Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:03 AM EDT
      MasterNav

      On another note - I think we are seeing a change in how Mr. Jobs does his presentation - there was not the conglomeration of things sprung at WWDC - the sole focus was the iPhone for the most part. The Steve alluded to this in January when he said 51 weeks left to go - a spreading out of the announcements to take the the heat off of the major events perhaps? Or maybe a more canny approach to managing expectations.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#6 - Tue Jun 10, 2008 7:54 AM EDT
      Neuski

      The calendar features you mention are already in iCal. I didn't know either till I tried this morning.

        Reply#7 - Tue Jun 10, 2008 12:49 PM EDT
        Dr Juice

        I look at it this way: $10 more for faster data and GPS, and another $8 a month for OTA syncing ($99.95/12). It will be interesting to see if Apple adds any hooks to the SDK to allow developers to pull documents and files out of iDisk or send files to it.

        I hadn't been sure whether or not I would buy a new iPhone, but now at $199 it's not a question for me.

        One thing is clear to me, though: massive price cut, new service, availability in more than 70 countries by year's end, a full development package. Apple is dead serious about creating a new platform.

          Reply#8 - Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:02 PM EDT
          electricblanket

          wonder if they were starting to feel the potential heat from android/google with their deep pockets...

          get people locked in before the new competition has their product on the market ( a bit like the 360 launch , but not really)

          • 1 vote
          #8.1 - Tue Jun 10, 2008 7:48 PM EDT
          Dr Juice

          Maybe, but I'm not sure that was the key motivator. They had to have been working on this for a while, and many of their carrier agreements around the world fell into place, and it's coming up on the 1 year anniversary, and they had a venue to announce it. I'm sure they want people locked in, but they don't want them to feel locked in :-)

          • 1 vote
          #8.2 - Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:07 PM EDT
          MasterNav

          Having worked in R&D some years ago I would offer that Apple has these items in dev for about 3 years ahead of release on average, mileage may vary. The concept may pre-exist that - depending on the maturity of the technologies in place at concept. Sometimes the idea gets backburnered because the tech is marginal or needs more maturity to be truly useful and cost effective - witness the development of flash memory and LCD screens. Touch for example was first developed back in the 80s, but there was not enough processing power to bring it into common use until much later.

          • 1 vote
          #8.3 - Wed Jun 11, 2008 4:03 PM EDT
          Reply
          gecko85

          MobileMe will be useless (for me) until they allow you to *send* from an account other than @me.com (or an existing @mac.com). If they ever start allowing additional SMTP servers, then I'd spring for it. As it is, I don't want or need another email address, no matter how well it syncs between my devices.

            Reply#9 - Wed Jun 11, 2008 11:52 AM EDT
            Kyle Baxter

            As I understand it, you can continue using your .Mac address both to receive and send email.

              #9.1 - Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:32 PM EDT
              Dr Juice

              True, and .Mac lets you check an external POP account (no IMAP), but doesn't let you reply from that address. If you're already using an IMAP service, the Mail sync stuff is already there as that's how IMAP behaves.

                #9.2 - Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:13 PM EDT
                gecko85

                Yeah, the sync part is there...but it would be great to be able to send/reply from an IMAP account. If I had MobileMe, it would be nice to have all my email accounts available from the web interface, for when I'm on someone else's computer. Sure, I can log in to my IMAP account, Gmail, etc...but the idea of a single place (MobileMe) for my email, contacts, and calendar would be great. As it is, it's *almost* there...just not quite.

                  #9.3 - Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:52 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  Henry VII

                  I think that I will definitely be getting an iPhone when it's released next month. That said, I feel that some things were cut to allow for the lower price. I would gladly pay an extra hundred or two for a better camera, 32 GB SSD, and higher resolution screen.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#10 - Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:50 AM EDT
                  Dr Juice

                  I'm not sure how much higher-res they could have made the screen without making it physically larger.

                    #10.1 - Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:12 PM EDT
                    Brian Ford

                    Yeah, the screen isn't one of the complaints you hear very often about the iPhone.

                    • 1 vote
                    #10.2 - Sat Jun 14, 2008 7:09 PM EDT
                    Henry VII

                    The iPhone is 160 ppi. A Nokia N800 is 225 ppi. That means you can get a much higher resolution. Things will appear smaller, but you can see more and it will be clearer.

                    • 1 vote
                    #10.3 - Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:39 PM EDT
                    Dr Juice

                    Fair enough, however I think a mobile device is one screen where you'd want things to appear bigger. I've been checking out the 17" MacBook Pro's and things are starting to look too small for me on those screens.

                      #10.4 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:47 AM EDT
                      Brian Ford

                      It's also got a larger screen, because it's a "tablet" not a smart phone. It's not really a good device to compare to the iPhone. A better comparison will be the N900, which is supposed to be out in "June 2008" but I can't find any specs even on Nokia's site, though an external site says it's screen will be the same size as the iPhones.

                      At any rate, again -- clarity simply isn't an issue for me on the iPhone and, again, it's not an issue I've ever read about. Quite the contrary, most people (critics and users) seem to rave about the screen clarity when compared to other similar devices.

                      • 2 votes
                      #10.5 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:03 PM EDT
                      Henry VII

                      4.1" is not much larger than 3.5" - and I specifically used PPI instead of actual resolution for that reason. As such, it is a perfectly valid comparison.

                      • 1 vote
                      #10.6 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 4:13 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      Henry VII

                      I suppose that depends on your eyesight. You can always magnify things with a high quality screen. With an average screen, you are limited to a larger size... not given the option to display more information at a smaller size. On my Nokia 770, a size 6 font is quite easy to read. That's a big plus if you're into reading eBooks or the Internets.

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#11 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:10 AM EDT
                      Dr Juice

                      Do 3G phones still give off the same "GSM noise" that I hear in my PowerBook speakers when my iPhone is charging? I'm guessing they do, but I hope it's not amplified.

                        Reply#12 - Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:56 PM EDT
                        Leave a Comment:
                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                        Newsvine Privacy Statement
                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                        FUN STUFF:
                        • Leaderboard |
                        • E-Mail Alerts |
                        • Top of the Vine |
                        • Newsvine Live |
                        • Newsvine Archives |
                        • The Greenhouse |
                        COMPANY STUFF:
                        • Code of Honor |
                        • Company Info |
                        • Contact Us |
                        • Jobs |
                        • User Agreement |
                        • Privacy Policy |
                        • About our ads
                        LEGAL STUFF:
                        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com